Study were analysed playing with SPSS twenty five.0. First descriptive analyses was in fact did, along with Cronbach’s alphas and frequencies. Binary logistic regressions were utilized to assess contacts ranging from gender, age, sexual positioning, having an enchanting/intimate partner, SNS made use of, sexting normalisation and you may readiness to take part in sexting because the independent variables, while the four sexting habits because based details. Nagelkerke’s R dos is actually considered as a way of measuring impression dimensions. All of the variables had been inserted to the design in addition. The research was also stratified by the intercourse.
Frequency from sexting behaviours
The most prevalent sexting behaviors are receiving (21.2%) and getting via a mediator (28.4%), followed closely by third-group forwarding off sexual articles (nine.3%) and you may, finally, delivering (8.1%). Detailed statistics get from inside the Table dos.
The new regression habits was extreme. Nagelkerke’s Roentgen dos was .42 towards the “sending” design, .31 with the “receiving” design, .23 into “third-people forwarding” model, and you may .17 to your “finding through a mediator” model (Dining table 3:
On “sending” design, determination to help you sext (OR: 8.26; 95% depend on period [CI]: 5.36-), having an enchanting/sexual mate (OR: step 3.44; 95% CI: 2.25-5.25), having fun with Snapchat (OR: 1.87; 95% CI: 1.19-2.93), intimate positioning (OR: step 1.77; 95% CI: 1.04-step three.00) and you may years (OR: 1.36; 95% CI: step one.step 14-step 1.63) were rather linked to sending engagement. In the “receiving” design, with an intimate/intimate mate (OR: step 3.dos7; 95% CI: 2.51-4.28), desire so you can sext (OR: 2.79; 95% CI: 2.01-step three.89), using Instagram (OR: step 1.89; 95% CI: step one.16-step three.10), sex (OR: step 1.82; 95% CI: 1.37-dos.41), playing with Snapchat (OR: step one.6step 1; 95% CI: step 1.dos1-2.14), sexting normalisation (OR: 1.49; 95% CI: step one.20-1.86) and you may age (OR: step one.26; 95% CI: 1.step 12-step one.41) was basically somewhat connected with searching engagement.
Meksikansk kvinnelige personer
Regarding the “third-team forwarding” model, having fun with Instagram (OR: dos.74; 95% CI: 1.16-six.51), determination so you’re able to sext (OR: 2.00; 95% CI: step 1.48-dos.72), gender (OR: step one.96; 95% CI: 1.32-2.91), with an intimate/sexual companion (OR: step one.86; 95% CI: step one.29-dos.68), using Twitter (OR: 1.53; 95% CI: 1.03-dos.26), sexting normalisation (OR: step one.43; 95% CI: step 1.09-1.87) and ages (OR: step 1.43; 95% CI: step one.22-1.66) was basically rather pertaining to involvement when you look at the third-people forwarding.
From the “choosing through a mediator” design, having fun with Instagram (OR: 2.step one6; 95% CI: 1.47-3.19), sexting normalisation (OR: 1.84; 95% CI: step one.52-2.24), that have an intimate/sexual spouse (OR: step one.7step one; 95% CI: step 1.35-dos.17), gender (OR: 1.4step one; 95% CI: step one.1step 1-step 1.80) and you will years (OR: step one.36; 95% CI: 1.23-step 1.49) were rather associated with engagement when you look at the researching through a mediator.
Sex differences
The new regression habits was in fact tall. Nagelkerke’s Roentgen 2 try .fifty for females and you will .41 to own boys to the “sending” model; .31 for girls and you will .31 getting males towards “receiving” model; .18 for women and you can .twenty-four having boys toward “third-party forwarding” model; and you can .14 for females and you may .twenty-two for males into “researching through an intermediary” design (Desk 4:
Throughout the “sending” model, for females, readiness so you can sext (OR: ; 95% CI: -), which have a romantic/intimate companion (OR: cuatro.54; 95% CI: 2.27-9.09) and you may many years (OR: 1.60; 95% CI: step 1.17-dos.20) was indeed significantly regarding sending wedding. Getting people, they were determination in order to sext (OR: 6.05; 95% CI: step 3.68-nine.94), with an intimate/intimate companion (OR: 2.79; 95% CI: step 1.59-cuatro.88) and using Snapchat (OR: 2.38; 95% CI: step one.32-cuatro.29).
In the “receiving” design, for females, willingness so you’re able to sext (OR: 5.11; 95% CI: 2.57-), playing with Instagram (OR: 4.34; 95% CI: 1.43-), which have a romantic/intimate partner (OR: step three.77; 95% CI: 2.49-5.72), sexting normalisation (OR: step 1.62; 95% CI: 1.13-dos.33) and you will decades (OR: step 1.42; 95% CI: 1.17-step one.72) was notably related to getting wedding. Having boys, they were which have a romantic/sexual spouse (OR: dos.97; 95% CI: 2.08-cuatro.25), willingness in order to sext (OR: dos.32; 95% CI: step one.58-step three.41), playing with Snapchat (OR: 2.03; 95% CI: 1.38-2.91), sexting normalisation (OR: step 1.40; 95% CI: 1.06-step one.86) and many years (OR: 1.20; 95% CI: 1.04-step one.38).